Skip to content

Working With Domain Brokers | DomainInvesting.com

Another thing that popped into my head after reading Elliot’s posting was that out of the few dozen sales I have made through brokers, two were to buyers who had previously bought domains from me. One of these two repeat sales was for over $1 million and the other was for around $20,000. In both cases they were to contacts at these companies that were different than who I was usually dealing with. The brokers had no way of knowing this, so it was not their fault, I just was surprised by it. But, I was still happy I got the sales.

Overall I would much rather use a broker than try to find a buyer for a domain by myself. Elliot has a good list of domain brokers at http://www.domaininvesting.com/guide/list-of-domain-brokers/. The only thing I would add to it is that Flippa.com is also a good way to sell domains. I have found the sale prices to be on the low end, but if you are eager to sell, at least you will find some bidders. You can always set a reserve so it does not sell for less than you are looking for.

via Working With Domain Brokers | DomainInvesting.com.

The dark side of .io: How the U.K. is making web domain profits from a shady Cold War land deal — Tech News and Analysis

In other words, a cut from the sale of every .io domain goes to the British government for the administration of a territory whose original inhabitants should arguably be getting that money, and whose only current inhabitants are 5,000 U.S. troops and spooks, their civilian contractors, and a handful of British personnel who are there for policing and customs purposes.
“Robbed”
When I approached representatives of the Chagossian community, they said they had been unaware that domains associated with their homeland were being sold for profit.

via The dark side of .io: How the U.K. is making web domain profits from a shady Cold War land deal — Tech News and Analysis.

BuyDomains and the economics of large domain portfolios | Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News & Views

If BuyDomains negotiated like Frank Schilling, it would sell a lot fewer domains per year. But would it make as much money, and not have to worry so much about replenishing its inventory?You could take it to the extreme on a much smaller portfolio, like that of Rick Schwartz. In Rick’s case, he hits the lottery every once in a while. It’s very inconsistent compared to BuyDomains or even Frank Schilling.BuyDomains, as a large business with employees and outside investors, needs a certain level of consistency that is harder to a achieve with a higher priced, fewer sales strategy.Between the BuyDomains model and Schilling is Marchex, which probably has a higher typical selling price than BuyDomains, but has a much lower sell-through rate as a result.I’d probably put HugeDomains in the same bucket as BuyDomains — high volume, low prices — although I’ve seen some sales that make me question that.

via BuyDomains and the economics of large domain portfolios | Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News & Views.

Endurance International EIGI Acquires The Assets of BuyDomains.com | TheDomains

Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc. EIGI, which bought Directi for $110 million ealier this year, has purchased the assets of BuyDomains.com according to its financial results for its third quarter ended September 30, 2014.
Endurance also owns a number of domain name registrars and hosting companies.
Under “Third Quarter Operating Highlights” the company announced they acquired three company’s for a total of $77 Million:

“During the quarter, the company acquired Webzai, Ltd. and the assets of BuyDomains.

In addition, on October 31, 2014, the company acquired the assets of Arvixe, LLC.”This is the first report of that BuyDomains was sold by Name Media or that Endurance purchased it.
BuyDomains reportedly owned hundreds of thousands of domain names.

via Endurance International EIGI Acquires The Assets of BuyDomains.com.

Factors Affecting Pigeon — A 5,000 Page Case Study

2. Strong Domains Matter

 

Local businesses need to attach their brands to strong domains. While Google has not explicitly confirmed that there is a bias toward brands in their ranking algorithm, many SEO practitioners have suspected as such since 2008, when then-CEO Eric Schmidt famously said that large brands served as a signal of quality, trusted content.

 

“Brands are the solution, not the problem. Brands are how you sort out the cesspool.”

Eric Schmidt, former CEO at Google

 

With Pigeon, our immediate impression was that big brands with national reach and large, established directory sites were the winners.

In other words, if you are a big brand and/or have a strong domain, you are in good shape. To verify this assumption, we hooked into the Mozscape API and compared two key linking metrics (external equity and page authority) to see how performance changed post Pigeon.

via Factors Affecting Pigeon — A 5,000 Page Case Study.

Revealed: The Niches with the Highest Chance of Selling, and more! | Flippa Blog

How Starter Sites Get Sold

We’ve found that Starter Sites bought through bids outnumber those bought through the Buy It Now option over 2:1. But surprisingly, most Starter Sites don’t get sold through bids nor the Buy It Now option…

How Starter Sites are sold

In fact,  57% of Starter Sites are sold after the auction ends. This is great news for Flippa sellers who didn’t get to sell their website during the auction period – as long as you’ve listed your Starter Site, it’s likely that an interested buyer is just around the corner ready to make you an offer for your website.

via Revealed: The Niches with the Highest Chance of Selling, and more! | Flippa Blog.

In Auction At Snap: Gynecologist.com & Obstetrician.com: Is Moniker Pulling A Tucows?

There are two great bang on medical domain names in closed auctions at Snapnames.com, Gynecologist.com & Obstetrician.comMore about the auctions in a few, but the history of the domain names may indicate that Moniker has gone the way of Tucows and is picking up expired domains for its own account and then selling them instead of letting the simply drop.

robsequin says
At least they are sending domains to auction. Enom might just keep the domain or sell it privately.
I have this confirmation in writing from ENOM support::
” I can confirm that eNom will sometimes keep domains from dropping to park them or sell them to private companies without sending them to at auction at NameJet.”

via In Auction At Snap: Gynecologist.com & Obstetrician.com: Is Moniker Pulling A Tucows?.

Can Namecoin Obsolete ICANN and More? | The Ümlaut

Namecoin is a fascinating substitute for the domain name system because, like Bitcoin, it is completely decentralized and censorship-resistant. Proposed censorship measures like SOPA and PIPA simply could not apply to Namecoin because it is virtually impossible to reverse or interfere with name registrations, which are enforced with strong cryptography. New top-level-domains are added by the consensus of the miners, just as Bitcoin miners must agree on the rate of growth of Bitcoin’s money supply.

Speaking of new top-level domains, the Namecoin community, such as it is, appears to be considering expanding beyond .bit to .tor. These latter domain names could be used for sites run as Tor hidden services, such as Silk Road 2.0. Instead of having to remember a URL like silkroad6ownowfk.onion Silk Road 2.0′s current URL, the proprietors of the site could simply register silkroad.tor and point it at the onion URL. Creating memorable Tor service addresses would remove one of the main stumbling blocks to use of the censorship-resistant network. This would in turn strengthen the hand of political dissidents not just black marketeers all over the world.

via Can Namecoin Obsolete ICANN and More? | The Ümlaut.

My Website Was Stolen By A Hacker. And I Got It Back. | Ramshackle Glam

SO WHY AM I STILL ANGRY?

Of course I’m angry with the person or people who stole the site, but that’s out of my hands. The reason I’m writing this post is to let people know that this really can happen – to anyone – and to offer suggestions for how to minimize the chances that it will happen to you below, but beyond that, I’m writing this post because this incident made me very, very angry at GoDaddy and HostMonster. And I want you to know why.

No one at either company questioned my statement supported by written proof that the website belonged to me. No one doubted that it had been transferred without my authority. And yet I had to spend days – days during which the hacker could have done virtually anything he wanted – trying to reach one single person who was able to do anything, because the support staff and supervisors I spoke with who had to have numbered fifty or more were completely uninformed as to how to handle this situation beyond saying, “Jeez, that sucks. Can’t help you.”

via My Website Was Stolen By A Hacker. And I Got It Back. | Ramshackle Glam.

Frank Schilling and the rise of the web domain name industry – FT.com

“Only 1 per cent of the population owns a domain name – some own more than one. I have hundreds of thousands of domain names, and I’m one man. I’m betting that there might be interest for 2 or 3 per cent of people to have them. Somebody has to make those names for the residents of the future. There aren’t enough good ones in the spaces that are already held.”

via Frank Schilling and the rise of the web domain name industry – FT.com.

Rachel Aviv: The Scientist Who Took on a Leading Herbicide Manufacturer : The New Yorker

According to company e-mails, Syngenta was distressed by Hayes’s work. Its public-relations team compiled a database of more than a hundred “supportive third party stakeholders,” including twenty-five professors, who could defend atrazine or act as “spokespeople on Hayes.” The P.R. team suggested that the company “purchase ‘Tyrone Hayes’ as a search word on the internet, so that any time someone searches for Tyrone’s material, the first thing they see is our material.” The proposal was later expanded to include the phrases “amphibian hayes,” “atrazine frogs,” and “frog feminization.” Searching online for “Tyrone Hayes” now brings up an advertisement that says, “Tyrone Hayes Not Credible.”

via Rachel Aviv: The Scientist Who Took on a Leading Herbicide Manufacturer : The New Yorker.

Demand Media: Rise and Fall of a Content Farm | Variety

The idea with Demand was to marry two businesses: domain name registration and low-cost content production. The foundations were the acquisitions of eHow.com, a provider of how-to tutorials, and eNom, a domain-name registration service provider.

Early on, Demand used eNom’s 1 million generic domain names such as “3d-blurayplayers-com” to serve up relevant ads to people searching for specific topics. These “domain parking” pages were immensely profitable, generating north of $100,000 per day, according to a former Demand exec who requested anonymity. “That’s $35 million-$40 million per year without doing any work,” the exec said.

But the tactic was fundamentally a bait-and-switch. Users landed on the pages expecting to find information on a subject and instead found an ad. To try to drive up traffic, Demand shifted its strategy, populating the sites with thematically related content. Counterintuitively, though, that decreased ad click-through, since people were reading the articles instead of the ads, according to the former executive.

via Demand Media: Rise and Fall of a Content Farm | Variety.

List of most expensive domain names – Wikipedia

This is a list of the top 20 highest prices paid for domain names.

  1. VacationRentals.com $35 million in 2007 [1]
  2. Insure.com $16 million in 2009 [2]
  3. Sex.com for $14 million in October 2010[2][3]
  4. Fund.com 2008 £9.99 million[2]
  5. Porn.com 2007 $9.5 million[2]
  6. Fb.com by Facebook for $8.5 million in November 2010[4]
  7. Business.com for $7.5 million in December 1999[2]
  8. Diamond.com 2006 $7.5 million[2]
  9. Beer.com 2004 $7 million[2]
  10. Israel.com 2008 $5.88 million[2]
  11. Casino.com 2003 $5.5 million[2]
  12. Slots.com 2010 for $5.5 million [5]
  13. Toys.com: Toys ‘R’ Us by auction for $5.1 million in 2009[2][6]
  14. Asseenontv.com 2000 for $5.1 million [7]
  15. iCloud.com by Apple for $4.5 million in April 2011[8]
  16. GiftCard.com by CardLab for $4 million in October 2012[9]
  17. Yp.com by YellowPages.com for $3.8 million in November 2008[10]
  18. AltaVista.com for $3.3 million in August 1998
  19. Candy.com for $3.0 million in June 2009[11]
  20. Loans.com by Bank of America for $3.0 million in February 2000[12]
  21. Investing.com by Fusion Media Limited for $2.45 million in December 2012[13]

via List of most expensive domain names – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Capitol Alert: Kamala Harris shutters 10 fake Covered California websites

“These websites fraudulently imitated Covered California in order to lure consumers away from plans that provide the benefits of the Affordable Care Act,” Harris said in a prepared statement. “My office will continue to investigate and shut down these kinds of sites. I urge Californians to avoid healthcare scams by visiting coveredca.com.”

Harris said her office two months ago launched investigations into the websites imitating coveredca.com, which began offering insurance coverage for sale on Oct. 1. The website operators were sent cease and desist letters telling them their sites violated state law and demanding their removal or transfer of their domains to the state exchange.

The sites were being run by private insurance brokers or companies, carried domain names similar to the state’s health exchange and contained unauthorized references to the exchange’s trademarked logo and name. Examples such as californiabenefitexchange.com, californiahealthbenefitexchange.com and www.coveredcalifornia.com contained phrases like “Get Covered,” “Covered California” and “California Health Benefit Advisers.”

Capitol Alert: Kamala Harris shutters 10 fake Covered California websites.

I am a college student who is looking to start a simple…

I sold the domain name socialgraph.com for $1500 to some woman claiming inexorably to want it for “just a personal homepage”. Ah well, I thought, I will probably never get around to building something for this particular domain anyway, might as well make a few bucks.

A few weeks later, Mark Zuckerberg is on Web 2.0 Summit telling about something he calls the Social Graph and I whip up the whois results for socialgraph.com.

Administrative contact: someone@facebook.com

Doh! Would probably have been able to score a few more bucks from recognizing the term social graph before Mark did.

Proof is in whois record history for socialgraph.com.

My #1 Doh moment so far | Hacker News.

The Secret of EMD: Exact Match Domains Revealed

Some people consider an exact-match domain (EMD) a thing of the past.

Others think EMDs are still going strong.

As for me, I always look at the data to the find the answers.

In this comprehensive resource on EMDs, I show you that data and reveal everything you need to know about exact-match domain names.

via The Secret of EMD: Exact Match Domains Revealed.

DomainNameSales.com Sales report – First 6 months of 2013 report. | TNTNames.com

Domain Sale Price
IronDeficiencyAnemia.com $6,000
RadioBuy.com $15,000
SuitCover.com $4,500
TubeGuards.com $4,000
Exma.com $19,000
CellPhoneCases.com $75,000
SpringRewards.com    $8,000
TucsonRealEstate.net    $5,000
walkintubs.com    $69,000
UnlockYourBrain.com    $3,000
SearchResults.com    $41,000
TripleShot.com    $4,000
WashingtonDCRealEstate.com    $28,500
StarLauncher.com    $6,500
JuicerRecipe.com    $7,500
SalleDEBain.com    $60,000
SpecTa.com    $15,000
Izabel.com      $25,000
BearField.com      $4,000
ChicagoChannel.com    $5,000
ShepherdPups.com    $3,400
campsandcottages.com      $3,300
RoadOne.com      $25,000
SecureScan.com    $8,800
NewsFeeder.com    $4,900
MTX.co.uk      $8,050
ThyroidTest.com    $18,000
LUBRifiCante.com    $3,900
MorningPeople.com    $5,000
RivoPharm.com      $3,900
PizzaStudio.com    $3,900
Fxx.net    $19,000
HomeSchoolingCurriculum.com    $10,000
CoupleTalk.com    $6,000
UltimateWear.com    $3,000
TrueAge.com    $13,000
DataYes.com    $3,000
PopupMusic.com      $5,500
ChopIT.com      $10,000
RollBar.com    $11,000
GreenDot.co.uk      $3,900
Catalyzed.com    $3,900
OvAce.com      $6,000
TEMT.com    $45,000
USAManagement.com    $3,000
gardenbenches.com    $14,500
ngames.com      $50,000
GiggleWater.com    $2,700

via DomainNameSales.com Sales report – First 6 months of 2013 report. | TNTNames.com.

Thanks To A Six-Figure Purchase By Reputation Changer, Brand.com Is A Thing Now | TechCrunch

The URL supposedly cost six figures, and you can see that the company has already taken it over to promote a product called “Brand.com by Reputation Changer.” President Michael Zammuto said the plan, ultimately, is to completely switch over to the Brand.com name. It will become the highest trafficked website in the reputation industry, he said, based on an analysis of Google search volumes: “Brand.com and the term ‘brand’ have much greater recognition with potential clients and with the general public than the term ‘Reputation’ or ‘Reputation.com’.”

via Thanks To A Six-Figure Purchase By Reputation Changer, Brand.com Is A Thing Now | TechCrunch.

Mint Is Yodlee’s YouTube | TechCrunch

To make things worse, Mint gave a “substantial” amount of Series A stock to Hite Capital in exchange for the Mint.com domain name. That stock was worth a “couple of million dollars,” says one source, after the acquisition.

via Mint Is Yodlee’s YouTube | TechCrunch.

Should A Startup Spend VC Funding On A Domain Name?

The ff Venture Capital portfolio is evidence of how much we believe this, e.g., our companies Alerts.com, Gobbler.com, Identified.com, Patents.com, Phone.com, and Plated.com. The awesome story of how CEO Joe Fernandez bought the Klout.com domain is one of many reasons we were excited to lead the seed round in Klout.  I was formerly Founder/CEO of a domain name investment bank, and still own about a hundred domain names personally.

A good domain name can catch attention, biasing people to prefer your company over competitors, and making it easy to reach the website if and when they decide to use it. A bad domain name can sink you.  Like a storefront and location in the offline world, your domain name is the very first vehicle by which potential investors/customers/employees evaluate your company before they even engage. There are three main factors to consider…

via Forbes http://www.shti.cc/3sCu